Skip to content
Vision Reels Studio

The Worst Games of 2025, Per Metacritic

Everywhere you look, enthusiasts are quick to share their selections of the greatest games of 2025. However, what of the flops, the failures? It's time to take a moment to honor the most panned games of the year, based on the aggregate scores from Metacritic. Are all of these games as bad as the reviews suggest? Here is the list.

10. Switch 2's Welcome Tour

Aggregate Score: 54/100, User Score: 3.4/10

The early response to this tech demo were heavily influenced by its $9.99 price tag, with many feeling cheesed off it wasn't a bundled game like similar console launches. Critical opinion was quite mixed, from "crushing disappointment" to somewhat forgiving appraisals that praised the polished software itself. Regardless of the debate, the title proved to be a notable commercial performer during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Aggregate Score: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10

Billed as "more than a racing game," this simulation from Competition Company and Teyon received overwhelmingly poor reviews. The consensus was that the game was lacking in almost every category, especially in a year featuring stellar racing experiences. Ultimately, this disappointing sim was best left unplayed.

8. Bubsy's Purrfect Collection

Metascore: 53/100, User Score: 8.6/10

First things first: the awkward title grammar is a minor annoyance. This anthology of retro Bubsy titles showcases a "attitude"-filled feline known for incessant hacky one-liners. The consensus was that these games haven't aged well originally and have not improved with age. The notably positive user score is a curious oddity to the professional reviews.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Aggregate Score: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This manga-based fighter faced significant backlash from both professionals and players. It was lambasted for a limited character selection and a dearth of features. Fan reaction was notably vitriolic, with some voicing a hope that the title's poor performance would serve as a lesson for future projects.

6. Neptunia Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, User Score: 5.3

A part of the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this bike-riding title tasks players with collecting cute monsters. Reviewers felt that its effort to mimic a unique experience was unsuccessful, coming across as more of a low-effort product than a meaningful series entry. Its brief runtime combined with a full retail cost raised eyebrows.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a piece of lost media from the mid-2000s, launched after nearly two decades in production delays. The developers opted to release the game as an period-accurate artifact of its time, acknowledging that contemporary players might criticize its dated design. As such, many reviews noted that the tale of its resurrection was far richer than the game itself.

4. Scar-Lead

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-styled third-person shooter inspired by games like *Returnal* failed to impress with critics. Frequent criticisms centered on uninspired foes, repetitive levels, and a unengaging plot. A much-criticized system involving the character's attire was seen as adding nothing and took away from the game's enjoyment.

3. Paramedic Simulator

Metascore: 44, User Score: 4.9

Recall the strategic surgery games of the past, then take out the memorable characters. That, according to reviews, is roughly *Ambulance Life*. Critics found the emergency response sections to be a slog, and the narrative's handling of its subject matter was criticized as being tone-deaf. The overall experience was deemed not very compelling.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This new direction for the classic digital companion formula turns the franchise into a minigame collection title. The result, based on critics, was a dull series of basic activities that rapidly grew tiresome. Some reviews went so far as to declare it one of the worst titles available on its platform, pointing to a complete absence of satisfying gameplay.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Intended to be a major open-world action game from a studio led by well-known figures, *MindsEye* was a spectacular commercial failure. Reviews savaged its poor shooting mechanics, dull missions, and a host of game-breaking glitches. Critics found it to be a regression compared to decades-old games in the similar style. Among the scathing reviews, a tiny number of fans found something to enjoy in the experience, offering a lonely counterpoint.

ML
The writer

Mark Lopez

Elara Vance is a creative director and video producer with over a decade of experience in visual storytelling and digital media production.

Vision Reels Studio

Type to search articles.