🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are remunerated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in Europe as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the state. A effort to erase the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the history when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and alertness to minor insults, but faced with the threats that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and adaptive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.